Guy Selling Durian Incident Video

A disturbing video went viral in 2017 showing a heated dispute between a durian vendor and his employee. What began as a disagreement over the presentation of some durians quickly escalated into a vicious physical attack, shocking viewers worldwide. This troubling incident, now known as the “Guy Selling Durian Incident,” not only revealed the dark underbelly of the exotic fruit trade but also underscored far deeper issues around worker exploitation, safety, and migrant rights. While the durian dispute may have seemed like an isolated case of workplace violence, it pointed to widespread injustices that demand society’s attention. The graphic footage serves as a wake-up call, compelling us to critically examine the unseen realities behind consumer demand in order to enact positive change across many levels. Following !

Guy Selling Durian Incident Video
Guy Selling Durian Incident Video

See More :

What Happened in the October 4th 2023 blackout conspiracy Reddit ?

I. What happend in Guy Selling Durian Incident ?

The “guy selling durian video incident” refers to a dispute between a durian vendor and his employee at a stall in Singapore that escalated into violence. The incident occurred in September 2017 and was captured on video, which later went viral online.

Durians are prized for their creamy, bittersweet flesh but also infamous for their pungent smell. Premium varieties like Musang King fetch high prices, so durian lovers can be very picky about the quality and selection.

The vendor and his worker got into a heated argument after the latter allegedly chose an unattractive, poor quality Musang King durian to prepare for a customer. The supervisor blamed the employee for selecting a bad durian and demanded that he pay for it out of his own pocket.

When the worker refused, the supervisor grew increasingly angry, threatening to fire him and hurling verbal abuse. Security camera footage shows the worker reacting by throwing down the stall’s cash box in frustration.

This provoked the supervisor to physically attack him – strangling him with both hands, pushing him against the table, and repeatedly punching and kicking him. The worker did not fight back and could only try to shield himself from the blows.

The assault was finally broken up when two other employees rushed over to intervene. But the worker sustained injuries like bruises and cuts, requiring six days of medical leave.

The viral video brought public attention to this dispute over durians between a vendor and his foreign employee. It raised concerns about worker exploitation, abuse of foreign workers, lack of workplace safety, and proper mechanisms for resolving conflicts.

The graphic footage was shocking to many viewers and highlighted how quickly workplace tensions can spiral out of control. It underscored the need for clear protocols on discipline and a culture of open communication to prevent such situations.

For durian lovers with high expectations of quality, the incident also illustrated how consumer attitudes can indirectly impact workers down the supply chain. Demanding perfection around subjective qualities like fruit appearance can create unreasonably high pressure in food retail.

The “guy selling durian” dispute thus shed light on multiple labor issues as well as the socio-cultural factors around exotic fruits like durians. Its virality sparked public discussion about the treatment of workers in service sectors like hawker stalls.

II. Details of the “Guy Selling Durian” Dispute

1. Employee Tasked with Selecting Durians

The incident began when the durian stall supervisor instructed his employee, Wang Lianzheng, to select and open two Musang King durians for a customer.

Musang King is a premium variety known for its bittersweet, creamy flesh and distinctive aroma. After the employee opened the durians, it became evident the fruit pulp was in poor condition – it had blackened spots and did not look presentable in the packaging.

This enraged the supervisor, who blamed Wang for choosing low quality durians. He demanded that Wang pay for the durians himself even though Wang felt he had just been following orders.

2. Employee Refuses to Pay for “Guy Selling Durian”

Wang refused to pay for the durians, considering it an unreasonable request since he was not at fault. The supervisor grew increasingly angry, berating Wang with vulgarities and threatening to fire him.

Tensions were rising as the supervisor’s temper flared over the quality of the “guy selling durian.” Wang insisted he should not have to bear the cost for just doing his job.

3. Supervisor Assaults Employee in “Guy Selling Durian Video”

The argument reached a breaking point when Wang reacted by throwing down the stall’s cash box in frustration. Seeing this, the supervisor charged towards Wang and began violently assaulting him.

Horrifying security footage shows the supervisor strangling Wang with both hands, shoving him against the table, and landing repeated blows by punching and kicking the employee. Wang did not retaliate and could only attempt to protect his head from the brutal physical onslaught.

The “guy selling durian video” shows the attack continuing for over a minute until two colleagues rushed in to intervene and put a stop to the disturbing assault. But significant damage was already done.

The raw footage exposed how an intense conflict over durians could escalate into a vicious altercation. The supervisor let his anger completely override any self-control, while the vulnerable employee was left stunned and injured.

III. Aftermath of “Guy Selling Durian Incident”

1. Employee Injuries and Medical Leave

The physical assault by his supervisor left Wang with multiple injuries, including bruises on his back and cuts on his hands. He had to take six days of medical leave to recover from the attack.

The brutal blows landed on Wang clearly took their toll, despite his efforts to shield himself. He was fortunate the injuries were not even more serious, given the intensity of the assault captured in the “guy selling durian video.”

2. Employee Reports Incident and Resigns

After the incident, Wang informed his general manager about what transpired. He also filed a police report on September 17, the day after the attack.

However, when the supervisor returned to the stall and offered Wang an apology, he found it difficult to accept given the traumatic experience. Wang expressed that he could no longer feel safe working there after the supervisor’s violent outburst.

Fearing for his personal safety, Wang decided to resign from his job. The distressing ordeal captured in the viral “guy selling durian video” had destroyed his sense of security at the workplace.

3. Company Dismisses Employee After “Guy Selling Durian Video”

Shortly after the supervisor assault, the company handed Wang a termination letter without providing any reason for his dismissal.

The dismissal notice came on the heels of the disturbing “guy selling durian video” going viral online. While the reason for Wang’s termination was not given, the timing suggested the company may have been responding to the flood of public scrutiny brought on by the video.

Rather than standing up for the vulnerable employee so brutally attacked, the company prioritized avoiding further backlash by severing ties with Wang. Their actions implied he was expendable regardless of being the clear victim in the incident.

The entire ordeal from assault to dismissal had lasting repercussions for Wang. It underscored the precarious situation of foreign workers who often lack protections and have little recourse even in cases of egregious harm.

IV. Background Issues Behind “Guy Selling Durian”

1. History of Pay Requests from Supervisor

According to Wang, this was not the first time the durian stall supervisor had demanded employees pay for fruits out of their own pocket.

On previous occasions, the supervisor had asked Wang to purchase durians costing $20-30 when he was dissatisfied with their appearance or quality.

This pattern of shifting financial responsibility onto workers for subjective flaws in the “guy selling durian” revealed deeper problems at the stall. The supervisor felt entitled to recoup any product losses from his employees.

2. Supervisor Known for Temper Outbursts

Furthermore, Wang shared that his supervisor had a reputation for losing his temper and verbally abusing workers. This included shouting vulgarities and hurling threats when angry.

The supervisor was also known to impulsively throw things around the stall whenever he felt frustrated or enraged.

His hair-trigger temper and volatility created an environment where employees had to be extremely cautious to avoid triggering an outburst. This likely contributed to the clash over “guy selling durian” spiraling out of control.

3. Employee is Foreign Worker

As a foreign worker in Singapore, Wang had limited protections or recourse in dealing with workplace abuse or unfair practices.

The “guy selling durian” incident highlighted the particular vulnerabilities faced by migrant workers who rely on overseas jobs. Language barriers, lack of community ties, and dependence on employer-sponsored visas make it very difficult for foreign workers to speak up against mistreatment.

Wang’s endurance of the supervisor’s temper and pay demands indicates the duress faced by many foreign employees trying to hold on to jobs abroad. The power imbalance allowed workplace disputes around “guy selling durian” to escalate without restraint.

V. Analysis of “Guy Selling Durian Incident”

The disturbing dispute caught on video has raised many serious questions and concerns for the public, employers, and workers alike.

1. Worker Exploitation and Abuse

The supervisor’s actions clearly constituted workplace violence and abuse towards his employee. His physical assault and verbal aggression showed blatant disregard for Wang’s well-being and basic human dignity.

The incident highlights inherent power imbalances that enable supervisors to exploit low-wage workers, especially migrants, who feel helpless to speak up or defend themselves for fear of losing their livelihood. More safeguards are needed to protect vulnerable employees from harm.

2. Mistreatment of Foreign Workers

As a foreign worker, Wang had little recourse after being brutally attacked by his superior at work. The company terminated him without cause after the incident, showing more concern for their reputation than Wang’s safety.

This exemplifies the frequent mistreatment and discrimination that migrant workers face worldwide. Greater oversight is necessary to ensure foreign employees have access to legal protections, fair wages, safe conditions, and agency to report grievances without retaliation.

3. Workplace Safety Issues

The unprovoked assault by the supervisor in the “guy selling durian video” indicates glaring lapses in workplace safety standards. Lack of oversight allowed tensions to escalate with violent consequences, which could have been prevented with proper training on conflict resolution and de-escalation.

Clear policies on workplace violence, enforced through regular audits and accountability measures, are essential to avoid similar eruptions of physical harm.

The dispute stemmed from poor communication, uncontrolled emotions, and lack of constructive channels for resolving disagreements. Proper mechanisms to manage conflicts before they intensify are vital for a healthy, cooperative workplace.

Training in nonviolent conflict management, establishing access to mediation, and instituting zero-tolerance policies on abuse can transform workplace culture for the better.

While the supervisor grossly overreacted, the trigger point involved subjective expectations around durian appearance. This highlights how consumer fixation on superficial notions of quality can put undue pressure on workers.

It underscores the need for more education on how aesthetic-focused demands incentivize wastage, environmental damage, and potentially unethical labor practices.

The “Guy Selling Durian Incident” thus sheds light on multiple complex issues pertaining to labor rights, workplace relations, migrant worker protections, and consumer ethics. The lessons from this case should spur positive reforms across various dimensions of the food retail sector.

Please note that all information presented in this article has been obtained from a variety of sources, including and several other newspapers. Although we have tried our best to verify all information, we cannot guarantee that everything mentioned is correct and has not been 100% verified. Therefore, we recommend caution when referencing this article or using it as a source in your own research or report.
Back to top button